Saturday, August 16, 2014

Jeff's Response About the Fazzi's

In regards to the e-mails I have been receiving regarding mckeekitty’s latest escapades (and other matters) I will say this: I was aware that a woman had called Carmine and Melissa a few months back inquiring about Trista, but had assumed that it was Grace’s M.O. because I was told that the woman was rude, drunk, and belligerent (an assumption that any educated blogger for Ayla could make). Trista, who was also there at the time, heard the short conversation before the Fazzi’s hung up on her. We recently checked with them, but no one has inquired since. So either the Fazzi’is, who still consider Trista as their daughter, are lying or mckeekitty is. I find this strange because mckeekitty (although I’m not aware of her drinking habits) to my knowledge has never intentionally lied. Sure she gets the facts wrong (one of her latest is that Wordman's last name is not Hanson), but I have never known her to make stuff up. Anyway, the point is mute and not to take anything away from the bloggers who are still trying to fathom what happened to Ayla (the only reason I started myself), I can no longer take part in the anonymity of blogging. unitedforayla.com is a domain that is still paid for by myself as well as aylareynolds.com and pressjustin.com. As such, United for Ayla will be back and it’s registered users will be notified when justice for Ayla is on it’s doorsteps, but despite the contentions regarding “The Case for Trista”, I fear that the echelon politics of our legal system have blundered the most highly published criminal investigation in the history of Maine... time will tell on all of us and there will be a reckoning. “The Case for Ayla” cannot be denied.

51 comments:

  1. I wasn't going to post it but since comments are high and it is being discussed anyway here it is.

    As far as the comments about Jeff's hatred of Grace, some are quick to forget what went on with the blogs and Grace opening fake blogs and pretending to take them over. She has brought turmoil to the online blogs and because there is no fire to fuel now I'm sure she has moved on to other cases however many of us have not forgotten what she has done especially me. She hired someone to stalk and take pictures of me and my kids... She deserves the comments she receives.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tori, do not start this shit again. I did not open Start The Lies. I did not pretend to take it over, I did take it over. I did not hire anyone to stalk you or to take pictures of your kids. I did jokingly ask AshleyP to take a picture of the cops at your house.

      Stop the lying. It's getting old and no one is buying the "Grace is the badguy" bullshit anymore. Jeff has more than shown his true colors.

      Delete
    2. Quick to forget? Not even close, Tori.

      No one's hands are clean, including your own.

      Delete
    3. Grace, nobody has it in for you, your doing fine all by yourself. Grant it your better medicated nowadays, but let’s review what prescriptions and time have erased:

      You did not start the “Start The Lies” blog, but you maliciously took it over when Jenn went away for the weekend with my recommendation that you could admin it while she was away. Once you had admin access, you kicked Jenn off her own blog and plastered it with astrology charts and conspiracy theories, which included Tori, Justin, Trista, and myself as the kidnappers of Ayla.

      You hijacked the IP tracker I gave you access too (they auto e-mailed me and informed me that the password had been changed) and after a few days of talking to your self under different monikers, you abandoned the blog when no one else would comment on your false claims that we were harassing you... which you still do to this day: http://justiceforayla.org/care/

      Your subsequent and subversive background check on Tori revealed that she had an outstanding warrant on unpaid fines. The Waterville police officer that came to Tori’s house informed her that they were given a tip from a female that called them with her whereabouts.

      About an hour later, Ashley messaged Tori on Facebook that you offered her money to park in front of Tori’s house and take pictures of her being arrested (which she was not thankfully, as she was just out of surgery with a daughter that was Ayla’s age at the time).

      Nowadays, your reduced to making wild claims under an anonymous moniker and following up with a “why what have you heard” comment (same thing you did on the hijacked blog).

      No, your not “the bad guy” Grace, you’ve just another lost soul pushing an agenda that has nothing to do what we came here for.. but people can change.

      You were one of the great advocates for Ayla, maybe you could be again.. if only you could stop making Ayla about you.

      Delete
    4. Jeff, no one cares about your ongoing feud with Grace, your cheap shots at Dana or your fascination with McKeekitty. Are there any updates in Ayla's case?

      Delete
  2. Yes, let's be candid.

    United for Ayla ceased to exist.

    Trista held her last public event for Ayla months ago.

    JohnP, former admin at u4a, has been outed as a liar by his own "friends."

    Carol Bengle Gilbert, according to her Yahoo contributor profile, is a lawyer.

    CG won't comment on anything concerning her editing client.

    The Fazzi's apparently have nothing good to say about Trista.

    Ayla's Timeline II, which was supposed to be completed by now, has never appeared.

    Phantom posters have appeared stating that Trista should sue for abuse and then donations are being solicited.

    To this day, not one person has been arrested for Ayla's disappearance.

    Ayla's name and photo's have been used to demean and ridicule persons who may be perfectly innocent of any wrong doing..

    Blog posts at FFA have suggested that the Dipietros are being assisted by corrupt officials, up to and including the Governor.

    "Anonymous" has aligned itself with this case with the maternal family's support

    Trista has spoke of plans to leave Maine.

    Blog admins conspiring together with Jeff to "test" other admins...yes there is lots of malfeasance connected to this case.

    Why is Jeff blabbing confidential stuff in the first place?

    The Case for Trista...Jeff's temper tantrum due to LE's refusal to let the maternal family direct the investigation.

    Rumors of Ayla being found in a sandpit, traced to the maternal side, and hushed-up on u4a.

    Jeff shutting the doors at u4a without warning-a move of total disrespect toward the mods who went on to form FFA.

    Seemingly no accountability at any time for funds collected in Ayla's name


    The maternal family aided in (wordman) and approved, the crafting and circulating, of an online petition to harass and demean, what is most likely an innocent family, the Tudela's., their business, and State Farm Insurance.



    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I trust Jeff about as far as I can throw him on his Harley.Talk about what Grace did, Jeff is no better than what he says about her. jmo

      Delete
    2. You want to stop all the crap? Post the original TC4A before all the re-writes and let everyone make up their own mind.

      Delete
    3. If someone did post the original, would everyone believe it was the original? You don't trust Jeff, so would you take him vouching for it? It would probably be a waste and change nobodies mind on what they think about it.

      Delete
    4. Dana, do you have a copy of the original since you were one of the people consulted?

      Delete
    5. "Jeff shutting the doors at u4a without warning-a move of total disrespect toward the mods who went on to form FFA."

      And they still kiss his ass. I wonder what he has over them?

      Delete
    6. Real classy, unproven comment there Anon 3:58, just what I would expect from you.

      Dana, since the original document would really be the property of Jeff, If you really want it posted, why don't you email him and ask him to post it? You could then ask for verification from one of the original receipients after it is posted. I still don't know if it would be believed by some.

      That would be the right way to go about it. You should not expect someone to post another's property. That would be like outing an identity or sharing an email without the other's consent. I know a lot of that has happened and some seem to like doing it, but it is not right.

      WWJD

      Delete
    7. AnonymousAugust 16, 2014 at 3:51 PM

      Dana, do you have a copy of the original since you were one of the people consulted?

      No I do not have a copy the only ones that would are the ones Jeff had write it.

      I only saw the finished document a few days before it went public.

      Delete
    8. AnonymousAugust 16, 2014 at 4:12 PM

      Dana, since the original document would really be the property of Jeff, If you really want it posted, why don't you email him and ask him to post it? You could then ask for verification from one of the original receipients after it is posted. I still don't know if it would be believed by some.

      That would be the right way to go about it. You should not expect someone to post another's property. That would be like outing an identity or sharing an email without the other's consent. I know a lot of that has happened and some seem to like doing it, but it is not right.

      WWJD

      I have asked to have the original posted through the site, are you saying Jeff doesn't read here anymore? I don't have his email and don't really want it. feel free to copy and send this request to him if you like.

      Jeff would you please post the original TC4A before it was re-written?

      I think Jesus would require two or three witnesses before I believe it.Although I would consider the original as close enough.

      Delete
    9. http://www.aylareynolds.com/anon/contact.html

      Delete
    10. Anon 4:12, what part of Anon 3:58's comment is unproven?

      Delete
  3. In TC4A, Jeff states "We believe that a Grand Jury presented with this evidence would issue an indictment, enabling police to make arrests."

    Yet this blog reported that a Grand Jury heard the case back in February 2012. This means that either the GJ handed down indictments that the DA has failed to act upon (think JonBenet Ramsey case), or they didn't feel there was enough to indict.

    So why does the maternal family think that presenting the case to the GJ again will make any difference? The blood evidence has not changed since then.

    ReplyDelete
  4. So whats the deal? Did you lie Mckeekitty?

    ReplyDelete
  5. This email is slightly different than the one at FFA.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Dana B, (8/16 3:35); I don’t have a Harley ..and the last thing you lifted was your keyboard of discontent. Sadly, a majority of your insights reveal that you stand in judgment of your own ignorance and you are blissfully unaware that you should be ashamed of yourself.

    I can no longer entertain your one-liner presumptuous comebacks designed to make you feel better about yourself at the expense of others.

    A trait that I would expect nothing less from bullies.. and cowards.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you Jeff you confirmed my suspicions about you.

      Delete
    2. Sorry about the Harley confusion thought I saw a picture of you sitting on one at one of the events.

      Delete
  7. Dana, what do you think you are helping to do by showing your dislike of Jeff? It does nothing to convince anyone anything in this case.
    And it makes me think ill of you when you drag john ps name into this. He had already said his illness was effecting him if he was truely your friend why did you do that to him?
    It also did nothing change anyone's thoughts on this case. It just looked hurtful to john.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. For your info I asked to see the original TC4A , I stated what an Admin had told me in a telephone conversation. I didn't say it was John P the other Admins couldn't wait to throw his name out there. I only had questions I wanted answered. If you want to think ill of me go ahead. Seems like if you ask what you and Jeff think are the wrong questions then you are thought ill of.

      Delete
    2. (((Dana)))

      I hold you and your dedication to Ayla and justice for her, and everyone involved, in high regard.

      Delete
    3. You are awesome, Dana.

      Jeff, a question for you. IIRC, you closed your "A Retraction and an Apology" post with something along the lines of "Know this. As we learn more, the story of Ayla is going to change." I cannot find the exact statement since U4A is no longer available.

      NEWS FLASH, JEFF. Truth and facts do not change. ONLY your truth and facts.

      Delete
  8. AnonymousAugust 14, 2014 at 1:06 PM

    Maybe the kitty should get up from her hangover and enlighten us. After all, she brought it up.

    from Jeff, August 16
    I was told that the woman was rude, drunk, and belligerent (an assumption that any educated blogger for Ayla could make). Trista, who was also there at the time, heard the short conversation before the Fazzi’s hung up on her. We recently checked with them, but no one has inquired since.

    Seems Anon 1:06 and Jeff may talk to each other.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My guess is that Jeff talks to quite a few people around here.

      Delete
  9. Thank you Jeff for the update. You still have a lot of people behind you.

    ReplyDelete
  10. http://crimeblog.dallasnews.com/2014/03/texas-man-charged-with-extortion-for-threatening-to-destroy-a-former-clients-online-reputation.html/

    Just FYI

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't understand. Who is using extortion?

      Delete
  11. "I was aware that a woman had called Carmine and Melissa a few months back inquiring about Trista, but had assumed that it was Grace’s M.O. because I was told that the woman was rude, drunk, and belligerent (an assumption that any educated blogger for Ayla could make). Trista, who was also there at the time, heard the short conversation before the Fazzi’s hung up on her."
    _____________________

    Really, Jeff?

    Why would Carmine and Melissa engage with a "rude, drunk, and belligerent" stranger over the phone? Um...I think I would have hung up, or perhaps say something along the lines of "We have no comment...goodnight."

    Trista was present? Interesting. Pretty "rude" of Carmine to state his feelings regarding Trista right in her presence.

    Did you ask Carmine why he gave his email address to a "rude, drunk, and belligerent" cold caller as our conversation wound down?

    I don't give my email out to strangers on the phone...do you?

    No one hung up on me, Jeff...nice detail, though. The conversation was civil, polite and candid. My takeaway was that the Fazzis are decent folks, and I appreciated their time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for telling your side. I'd take your word over Jeff's any day.

      Delete
    2. Thanks McKeekitty. I figured you would say something like this. Integrity. Something Jeff sorely lacks. I almost can't believe Jeff would lie so blatantly, knowing how easy it would be for you to re-contact the Fazzis to verify. But then, maybe he isn't used to people vetting him. CG sure didn't.

      Delete
  12. "Sure she gets the facts wrong (one of her latest is that Wordman's last name is not Hanson)."
    ________________

    Ooops...you slipped Jeff. I said his name IS Jim Hanson. Unless you are also calling your sister a "liar." She made it clear that your brother is Wordman.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wordman is our brother but his name is not Jim Hanson - I think that's what he meant. Judy

      Delete
    2. anonymous from maineAugust 18, 2014 at 6:33 AM

      Really Judy?! Now who's playing games? YOU are the one who told us that "Word man" was Jim Hanson! Sounds lime your now back peddling. My question is why??

      Delete
    3. Calm down, nobody is playing games. I never said his name was Jim Hanson - His name is Jim - I never said his last name. Judy

      Delete
    4. Who cares. The point is that "Wordman" was NOT a random commenter, but someone directly connected to the Reynolds family, just like CG is hired help for them. Of course neither was forthcoming about that fact.

      Delete
    5. Also, CG never mentioned her conflict of interest in her "articles."

      Delete
    6. Well somebody cared enough to jump all over me and acuse me of playing games (lying). I just wanted to clear that up. Judy

      Delete
    7. Judy...I'm sorry. I drew the erroneous conclusion that since Jeff and Jim are brothers, they share the same last name. Thank you for clarifying.

      Hope you are well, Judy.

      Delete
    8. Hey Kitty - n/p - 4 kids - 4 different last names. Same mother and father. And thats the truth!

      I have been awesome! Hope you and your hubby are well!
      Judy

      Delete
    9. To be honest I thought you guys already knew Jim was wordman - did I just confirm it? I cant remember.... still CRS. Best that I not talk lol

      Delete
    10. Thanks, Judy! Again, I'm sorry I put you on the spot.

      LOL...there must be a story regarding four different last names from the same set of parents, but that is neither here nor there.

      I'm thrilled to hear you are doing great!

      We are well. Thank you for asking.

      Delete
    11. I don't know that CG was hired help. I don't know that there was impropriety or a conflict of interest. I don't think it's fair to assume these things.

      Mostly, I'd like to know why any person would be involved with the release of information which legitimately involved parties stated could jeopardize Ayla's case. I'd like to know why Trista/Jeff's wishes superseded the profession judgement of LE and the AG office, if we're truly here for justice for Ayla.

      Delete
    12. CG referred to presumably Jeff, or someone associated and responsible for the TCFA, as her "client." That clearly infers hired or pro bono work. Therefor she should have disclosed this fact in her "impartial" "news" stories.

      Delete
    13. I hear you, Anon 1:16, and I don't necessarily disagree, but I'd like to hear it directly. I doubt that I will.

      Delete
    14. I don't think CG or her Yahoo articles have ever been impartial.

      To be fair though, I seem to recall CG stating that when she began work on TCFA, she notified Yahoo contributor that she would no longer be submitting articles. .....I assumed she meant in regards to Ayla's case.

      The important thing, as the anonymous above stated, is why she, or anyone for that matter, allowed for Trista/Jeff's wishes to supersede the professional judgments of L.E and the AG.'s office?

      Hi Judy, nice to hear that you are doing awesome. Thanks for clearing up the confusion concerning Wordman.

      Delete
  13. “The Case for Ayla” cannot be denied.
    __________________

    Sure it can, Jeff. It was edited numerous times. Fine tuned. Polished. Reviewed by your "lawyer" friend who considers you her "client" and thus states accountability and transparency are "protected" rights that do not require scrutiny.

    The audacity to question such a fine presentation...

    PS: Your attacks on Dana are truly revolting. Dana...a true advocate for AYLA. And this is how you express your appreciation for his efforts...by slamming him? SMH.

    ReplyDelete